| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 23 2010 Post subject: WHY "low and slow" for Xyrem? |
|
|
So, I see it over and over, but I never see anybody explaining why they think people should go "low and slow" with Xyrem. What is the reason for the recommendation? I'm not saying it's a bad or good recommendation; I'm just curious as to why people keep saying it.
So, why do people say it?
Thanks in advance,
GW |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willow2007
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 1476 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: May 23 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
There are many reasons. 1. because there is a high salt content in Xyrem, which can cause feet and hands to swell, blood pressure to go up, etc.
2. You can have side effects from sudden increases, your body will adjust better to a slow increase. 3. When you are actually sleeping well, your body makes more HGH, which changes the chemicals in your body, some people need to adjust their thyroid, some people need more calcium or magnesium, etc. 4. After an increase in Xyrem, you should stay at one amount for a couple of weeks (I stayed at 2.25 x2 for over a year), so you can see if its right for you. If you are sleeping well, staying asleep, have lots of energy, why increase and risk more side effects? If the meds are doing what you want them to do, there is no reason to increase and risk side effects, BP increases, etc. The idea is to use the least amount of meds to do what its supposed to do. Lots of people think that increasing will mean they will sleep better. That's not exactly true, because I sleep best at 3.25 and 3.0. If I go past 3.0 for my second dose, I feel drugged for quite awhile in the morning. And it takes weeks sometimes to see if you feel better or if you need to increase it again.
5. What's the rush? If you plan to be on Xyrem for a long time, might as well be gradual and learn what is best for your body. Add vitamins , etc. to see if that helps too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: Who said I was in a rush? |
|
|
Please don't make assumptions based on my asking a question. I didn't say I was in any rush; I simply asked a question.
And as for the lower dosage, for me, the low doses DID NOT WORK. AT ALL. All I got was headaches, dizziness and various other unpleasant side effects- but no sleep. So, for me, staying at 2.25g for a YEAR would have been nothing but torture. I am educated and intelligent, and I said absolutely nothing that would indicate that I'm looking to "max out" my dose or take more than the bare minimum required to get me to sleep, so again, please don't infer what you think I'm doing with no actual information about my use.
Thank you for answering the question I asked; I appreciate it. But please leave the inferences out, especially since they're quite inaccurate. Extremely inaccurate, as a matter of fact. And I'm already taking supplements, and am not having any problems with Xyrem, which is why I asked the question. I see people saying it over and over without actually explaining why they're saying it, and in your response, the only thing that strikes me as verifiably factual is the salt content comment. Can you provide me with a link to information about why it is "bad" to increase a dose versus staying at one that doesn't work for a long period of time?
I don't mean to sound belligerent, but I admit to being offended by the assumptions you've made about me based on a very simple question. All I was seeking was factual information about why "low and slow" is better than any other dosing approach, because it seems to be something that people keep saying without any actual reasons except that somebody else said it to them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willow2007
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 1476 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
My, my Touchy aren't we?
There were 3 words in my entire post, "what's the rush?" that you are taking as my entire post. I happened to think there was quite a few points in my post that were helpful. THAT;s why one should go slow.
there are a lot of people that think more is better. They go up to 4.5 x2 in a few weeks, then they find the side effects are horrible, then they quit taking it and tell everyone that Xyrem does not work for them.
I was not being presumptuous at all. However, I will be presumptuous from now on. When I see YOUR name, I will presume that you are a grouchy so and so, and I'll not answer your posted questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mich.monica
Joined: 19 Feb 2010 Posts: 65 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to respond to Willow. I also think you did not make any assumptions about the above question.
My Dr. was "in a rush" to give me 4.5 x2 I have no other information about Xyrem other than the Dr and the pharmacy. So, I did what I was told. I was able to sleep soundly but woke up like a hangover for hours. When I went to the Dr. and told him I didn't feel better he just increased my RX.
I am thankful that I found this website. I read a post from Willow one day about the slow approach. I decided to start over at 2.25 x2 and did not increase for weeks. I feel so much better. I am very, very grateful that people are here to tell their story. I know we are not all alike but personal stories are so helpful. I will continue to look for other ideas to make me a functional PWN.
PLEASE BE KIND TO EACH OTHER. I need people to post their ideas, even if they are not scientific. The worst thing to happen is that I won't try the idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: Who's touchy? |
|
|
| Willow, you DID make assumptions about me, and I called you on it. There is no need to follow up with further snark. The FACT is, you drew unwarranted inferences, and made assumptions about why I was asking the question. I asked a simple question and got only one factual response from you, which was about the salt intake. I am seeking valid, verifiable REASONS for the recommendation, not anecdotal assumption. If you don't know, simply say you don't know- there's no need to make it about being snide to me and making assumptions. I am seeking REFERENCES for this "low and slow" recommendation. I didn't challenge it, I didn't say it was wrong, I didn't say anything EXCEPT that I wanted to know WHY people make the recommendation. It seems to me that you don't have any actual science, just anecdote, so my current opinion of the "low and slow" is that it is a recommendation that is based on somebody's personal experience, not that it's actually based on empirical evidence. Simple as that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: For Mich Monica |
|
|
It really doesn't matter if you didn't think Willow's response to me made assumptions about me- the REALITY is, Willow DID make assumptions about me, and they were uncalled-for.
I have no issue with sharing information. I have no issue with people even sharing information based on their personal experiences. But when I ask a simple question and somebody chooses to make assumptions about me based on the simple act of ASKING A QUESTION, it ticks me off, and when the person then follows up with even MORE snark, my opinion of that person and that person's OPINIONS is colored accordingly.
Now I feel that Willow parrots things without doing any actual research rather than thinking that Willow is a friendly, helpful person who might provide a useful answer to a simple question. I feel this because of the way Willow responded and the inferences Willow drew, which, again, were unwarranted.
Just because it worked for Willow to stay at 2.25g 2x nightly for A YEAR doesn't mean that it's valid for everybody to follow Willow's dosing. As a matter of FACT, had I stayed at 2.25g for any longer than I did, I would have stopped taking Xyrem altogether, because it DID NOT WORK at that dose. It DID NOT WORK at any dose until 3.75g. I titrated my dose based on MY experience and MY chemistry with MY doctor's guidance. What I did was to start at the 2.25g 2x nightly dose, which was miserable. It gave me a headache, made me dizzy, and did not make me sleep. I then titrated .25g at a time, spending 5-7 days at each titration to see if I got anything other than worsening side effects. The first time I "just fell asleep" was at 3.75g, and I stayed at that dose for weeks and noted the success rate (sleep was success, miserable lying in bed with room spinning was failure). I had a 30% success rate at 3.75g. Now, however, I have a near-100% success rate with 4.25g for the first dose and 3.75g for the second dose.
For Willow to tell people something that appears to be based purely on his/her personal experience rather than actual verifiable fact means that the "low and slow" posts I keep seeing are, as far as I can tell, based PURELY on people's INDIVIDUAL experiences, rather than on empirical fact. And that is my point- none of what Willow lists as "reasons" for the recommendation is backed up by any science whatsoever, just by parroting of opinion as if it were fact.
I have not had problems with Xyrem- my appetite has returned, I'm sleeping well, and I'm no longer lying in bed completely mentally alert while my muscles contract and my head aches and I suffer because the dose isn't high enough to get me to sleep. So, for me, "low and slow" was NOT the way to go, and had I tried to stay at 2.25g because of some specious recommendation that this is somehow a "better" way to titrate, I would have quit Xyrem altogether because, as I said, IT DID NOT WORK at the lower doses. I wonder how many other people have given up on Xyrem because they took one person's experience as gospel and tried to suffer through a dose that was too low to help them sleep, but more than enough to give them unpleasant side effects. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sleepysusan
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 169 Location: St. Paul, MN
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| Geekwench, you're the one who asked the question. Be grateful you got any answers at all. With your attitude, you're lucky anyone bothers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: Let's see how much is fact and how much is presumption... |
|
|
| Willow2007 wrote: | | There are many reasons. 1. because there is a high salt content in Xyrem, which can cause feet and hands to swell, blood pressure to go up, etc. |
Okay, this is factual, as I said before.
| Willow2007 wrote: |
2. You can have side effects from sudden increases, your body will adjust better to a slow increase. |
Do you have any data to support this claim? This is exactly why I asked the question- to see if somebody has real data that supports this. I'm sure that there must be data somewhere, but I'm not sure that all of this "low and slow" "recommendation" is based on data rather than individual experiences.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | 3. When you are actually sleeping well, your body makes more HGH, which changes the chemicals in your body, some people need to adjust their thyroid, some people need more calcium or magnesium, etc. |
Again, do you have any reference material for this statement? From a factual perspective, the need for calcium and magnesium (and potassium, which you didn't mention) is not because Xyrem "changes the chemicals in your body"; it's because some of the side effects of massive sodium intake can be mitigated by concomitant consumption of potassium, magnesium and calcium, keeping electrolytes balanced. Changes in thyroid function may be the result of an increase in bodily production of HGH, or it may not be- I was seeking information to support assertions such as this.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | 4. After an increase in Xyrem, you should stay at one amount for a couple of weeks (I stayed at 2.25 x2 for over a year), so you can see if its right for you. If you are sleeping well, staying asleep, have lots of energy, why increase and risk more side effects? If the meds are doing what you want them to do, there is no reason to increase and risk side effects, BP increases, etc. |
Now, see, here's where you start making assumptions, although you apparently didn't notice that you were doing it. You assumed that I or some imaginary person was "sleeping well, staying asleep and [have] lots of energy" at a low dose. You make the assumption and then you further it by assuming that somebody who is sleeping well on a low dose even wants to increase the dose, which was in no way evidenced by my query.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | The idea is to use the least amount of meds to do what its supposed to do. |
That's the "idea" in any medicine. Use the lowest therapeutic dose.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | Lots of people think that increasing will mean they will sleep better. |
More assumption. I have yet to see somebody say that, and I certainly didn't say it, so why assume it?
| Willow2007 wrote: | | That's not exactly true, because I sleep best at 3.25 and 3.0. If I go past 3.0 for my second dose, I feel drugged for quite awhile in the morning. |
That is YOUR PERSONAL experience. That doesn't mean it's true for everybody.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | And it takes weeks sometimes to see if you feel better or if you need to increase it again. |
Again, this is your opinion, and you give me no factual data with which to validate it.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | 5. What's the rush? If you plan to be on Xyrem for a long time, might as well be gradual and learn what is best for your body. |
Again, this is your presumption and assumption, not evidenced by anything I wrote.
| Willow2007 wrote: | | Add vitamins , etc. to see if that helps too. |
I don't recall listing any complaints when I asked why people advise "low and slow". So why did you assume that I have any? Why did you assume that I'm not already taking supplements, which I am, but for valid, scientifically-supported reasons, not because somebody spouted opinion as fact on an Internet message board.
That was my point, Willow. Your response had a lot of opinion and assumption and it offended me. You could simply have said, "I'm sorry I offended you; it certainly wasn't my intent" rather than following up the way you did, and the way that you did choose to follow up is why my opinion of you has changed accordingly.
I won't respond further as it is not my intent to start a flame war. I simply expressed that your assumption offended me, because it did offend me. End of story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: Sleepysusan |
|
|
Perhaps you might take a step back before piling on with more snark. I would assume that we are all adults here, despite evidence to the contrary. Perhaps you might try to back off a little on the emotional responses and re-read things with a cooler head.
I asked a simple, single question and got a lot of assumption about me and my motives in return. Just as it is my right to be offended by somebody making such assumptions, it is your right to post a needless response about my "attitude", but the reality is, Willow DID make more than "three words" of assumption, and your response only furthers my opinion that there is a lot of opinion being presented as fact going on here. I am certain that your opinion of me is equally derisive, since you've expressed as much, so really, there's no need to express it again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sleepysusan
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 169 Location: St. Paul, MN
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| Geekwench, you're the one who has lost her cool! Willow gave you a response that was based on her own experience and understanding. You have taken offense to it for some reason and you just won't let it go. If a response isn't helpful, thank the person for what they offered and then clarify the question. Don't start a war over it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geekwench
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 170
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: It's called "projection", Sleepysusan |
|
|
| You're projecting. Look it up. Seriously, how about if we all just ratchet the emotion down a few dozen notches? This is a bit ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yawningdog
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 1756
|
Posted: May 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
Back to the original question, why low and slow.
I believe that the deep sleep gotten with Xyrem, that we have not been getting, comes as a shock to our systems. Human Growth Hormone is released during deep sleep. It effects the pituitary gland which in turn controls all the others. This 'revving up' of our system can lead to a number of side effects.
I suffered from BP spikes when I first started, and I jumped in a 3 and went to 3.75 in a week. I got the vitamin supplement info from the American Heart Association's webpage. I found that I had to stop all stimulants, take the vitamins and get some exercise to finally get over the BP problems. I have stopped and restarted Xyrem a couple of times. Every time I restart, when I up my dose the BP problem comes back.
I have also experienced going hyperthyroid on Xyrem. HGH is the only explanation for me to suddenly be producing more thyroid of my own, making my synthyroid dose suddenly an overdose.
I am not surprised that 3.75 is where you a finally getting it to work. Over 3 seems to be a common therapeutic point. If you find that you start to get a stiff neck or shoulders, you might be getting some of my BP problems. That is how it started for me.
I hope you fly through this with no side effects at all, not everyone has problems but, they do happen.What is unfortunate is that most doctors and even Jazz doesn't have any answers for people. It is only here, with the people that are taking the medicine rather than those prescribing it or manufacturing it, that you can get any kind of help if things start to go wrong.
Currenly, my resting heartrate and bp are slightly higher than they were before Xyrem. That seems to be a permanent change for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tracy
Joined: 26 Jul 2001 Posts: 2019 Location: Minneapolis area
|
Posted: May 25 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | You're projecting. Look it up. Seriously, how about if we all just ratchet the emotion down a few dozen notches? This is a bit ridiculous. |
The only one ratcheting up emotion and making accusations is you GW and I agree it is ridiculous.
Our message boards are meant to be a friendly, helpful exchange of opinions and the sharing of experiences - patient to patient. If you expect patients to post research data explaining THEIR PERSONAL EXPERIENCES and side effects of their medication use, you are being unrealistic.
I am all for a friendly debate, but when one crosses the line and attacks within our friendly community of people who are here to learn and receive support, then I must step in -
If you cannot "play nice" then please move on and find another message board more suited to your needs. Consider this your first friendly warning....2 strikes and you're out.
Tracy Nasca
Founder and Senior Vice President
Talk About Sleep |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LeslieFromTexas
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: May 25 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | If you find that you start to get a stiff neck or shoulders, you might be getting some of my BP problems. That is how it started for me.. |
I have the stiff neck and shoulders. My last doc visit was in March and my BP was fine. Is this something I should start monitoring more carefully?
I went up too quickly to 3 x 2 and my anxiety was horrible. I started over and now I'm fine |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|